My neighbor claims that his preschool child is
capable of making correct change from a five-dollar bill. Now, my area of is not
this age group nor do I know where this math skill falls within
an 'age-appropriateness' scale of standards. I do know, to me, this is
impressive. I also know, that regardless of whether or not this is accurate
(afterall, the father has five school age children), there are
children who clearly achieve at remarkable levels.
So, if young Joe is "advanced" for his age
in mathematics, or other academic areas, should he be "moved ahead" in
grade level? And, what if he is '"on target" or even
'behind' with his language development? Would I think otherwise if Joe
was in high school?
In my fifteen years of working with high school
students, I have recollection of only a handful of students who have graduated
early, heading to college studies at age 16 or 17. I don't know of any students
who have been "held back." Of course there are the
"super-seniors," those who have not met requirements for graduation,
who continue in "alternative programs." Oh, and those who
"drop-out" altogether.
Teaching and learning is clearly
"different" today than years ago. Advances in science and
technology result in increasingly greater and faster access to information that
hastens the rate at which society is able to respond. Farewell to stories of a
pony-express and waiting
several weeks for word to travel cross-country.